Mohandas K. Gandhi(1869-1948) was an Intelligent Fraud
It is said that when Gandhi was shot, his last words were “Hey Ram”.
For those who don’t know (lord) Ram is name of a Hindu god. Lord Ram is depicted an ideal human in a Hindu script know as “Ramayana”. It is well known fact that Mr. Gandhi believed in god. He also preached that we should have fate in god.
British applied all kinds of inhuman punishment to Indian in order to suppress there voice against independences.
Mr. Gandhi use to appeal Indian to remain calm and non-violence against injustice.
In attempt to get justice and to prevent humanity it is justified to kill demons in the society (in case British’s).
Even lord Ram & lord Krishna depicted an ideal human in a Hindu script know as “Ramayana” and “Bhatvata-Gita” did took to violence in attempt to prevent injustice.
So why did the follower of Ram (Mr. Gandhi) appeal Indian to remain calm and non-violence against injustice?
This is completely opposite to the teachings of Bhatvata-Gita and Ramayana both these text are as 'holy Bible' and 'holy Qurran' to Hindus.
For instant consider Ramayana. It is said that Raven (lord of Demons) kidnapped Lord Ram’s wife (mata) Sita and was determined to marry her. In order to liberate his wife Ram wedged a war against Raven who was king of Lanka (present Sri Lanka). In this attempt lord Ram’s and his Army destroyed Raven, his Son’s, his brothers, and his army.
Now after reading this anyone can visualize India or 'Bharat (mata)' was captured by British’s and it was the duty of followers of Ram to liberate 'Bharat mata' by destroying British’s.
My point is straight forward ‘If Gandhi was a follower of Ram he should have advised the masses to take on and destroy the British’s.
But Gandhi was a puppet of British’s.
The deal between Gandhi and British looks straight to me ‘ask Indians to be non-violent against as (British’s) and we will help you (Gandhi) to get political mileage and suppress your (Gandhi’s) political opponent.’
Unfortunately (for Indian) this deal worked.
Any person with very little common-sense can point out the fact the thousand of innocent Indian were slaughtered by British’s for no reason atoll. In fact British’s never need any reason to hang, to Latti-charge or to imprison any Indian. Very common and wicked example to support my statement is Massacre of Jalianwala Bagh which took place in Amritsar, Punjab (13 April 1919). The official figures were 379 killed and 1200 wounded. Actual numbers were 1300+ dead and many more wounded.
Again my point is why Gandhi’s public gathering was not targeted. Why Gandhi was never latti-charged nether shot dead like my other Indian who supported freedom struggle.
The reason seems straight forward. Gandhi brainwashed and convinced Indian to give up violence against British’s. This was a plus point for the British’s.
NOTE: All my thought is unbiased and independent. My intentions are not to hurt feeling of any person or political party. Everything written herein is true to my best of my knowledge.
Do you agree with me or not?
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
This comment has been removed by the author.
ReplyDeleteto great extent your point seems to be correct
ReplyDeleteYes, You are right!
ReplyDeleteI agree ur points
ReplyDeletei hate gandhi
ReplyDeleteu can also join the group''I HATE GANDHI''
ON FACEBOOK
yes u got it.we should not have let the british grow big in our country.i understand we dont have big weapons,but indian subcontinent as a whole should have made a war with british,unity was lacking and some followed ahimsa.
ReplyDeleteMY POINT IS DO OR DIE
absolutely true....he also opposed our most intelligent leader dr.ambedkar.....he was a full fraud..
ReplyDeleteyes
ReplyDeleteI agree your points and views.
Everyone should start thinking
So essentially, you are saying, Gandhi was a fraud because he didn't wage a war on the British like some old story book told him to.
ReplyDeleteDon't see how a book, whether or not a holy book should govern the actions of a man, and a country where not only hindus live, but also christians, muslims, jews, jains and buddhists. All of them do not follow the Ramayana or Mahabharat and all of them do not believe in hindu ideology. So there is no need for them (or anyone) to follow the example of the Ramayana and 'destroy the British's'
Your points are invalid, and you have not done your research properly. Gandhi was lathi charged during the early part of his movement, but as his popularity grew, The Raj would rather take him into custody rather than lathi charge him in front of devoted supporters in order not to instigate further violence. This seems perfectly reasonable, and doesnt mean that he was on their side.
Gandhi's gatherings were targeted. The British response to his Dandi march is one of the examples of this.
Your spelling and grammar is atrocious, you have put forward a set of arguments based on religion, mythology and misguided information. So, I refuse to take your words seriously and urge my countrymen to condemn you.
arul i dont agree with u as u said gandhi is a great freedom fighter why dont he oppose the execution of bagath singh sukhdev and rajguru even he has a chance to do.
ReplyDeleteAlthough I definitely think that Gandhi was instrumental in India attaining freedom, IN THAT TEXT, I never said that Gandhi was a great freedom fighter. I don't know where you got that from.
ReplyDeleteBhagat Singh and Rajguru were revolutionaries who used violence to drive the British out of India. One of Gandhi's core principles was that violence should not be used against the British. You dont need to be violent to be a freedom fighter, and you dont need to support violence to become a great freedom fighter. He did not oppose the execution, but that doesn't mean he hated Bhagat Singh or sided with the British. He did not agree with their method, but the end goal and vision was the same. Both of them had different methods. I think you need to do a LOT more research before you condemn Gandhi outright the way you have, and look at the changes he brought to India, rather than the changes he didnt, but could have.
I don't agree i don't think that gandhi ji was the best we got freedom ONLY coz of gandhi.....but i guess this point is wrong....d reason is simple coz this true that indian army was very very backward n british army very very advanced i think a war would have led on blood shed of indians......
ReplyDeletethere is no core principles to MK Gandhi... he is just an opportunist... for example.. his stupid ahimsa plan...he we all ahimsa with the british - then recruited indians to fight WW1 and WW2 against the germans...his logic seems the british who robbed us blind form the richest nation to the poorest nation in just 300 years flat is good, but the germans who are the enemy of british are ought to be killed..where is his ahimsa in that...i agree with the author in this..he was a stooge of the british..who above all feared an armed resistance emerging in india... which our guy in the currency notes was able to avoid...
ReplyDeleteand one more thing there are many more gandhis who is trying their best to out do our old gandhi...people with indian names and passport but whose loyalty lies to the masters overseas...be on the look out for them....an enemy inside our country is more dangerous than an outside enemy....
ReplyDeleteHi
ReplyDeleteThe true typical example is N.Godse. Do you know why he killed Gandhi? That too after getting Freedom from British. When Pakistan was separated from India migration was announced that all indian Muslims should go back to India from Pakistan. Same vice versa from India to Pakistan. Gandhi did not make any security arrangements for people coming to India from Pak. During migration many kids were killed and all woman's were raped irrespective of age. Godse wife sister and mother was also a victim. How can a man choose ahimsa while all his family women's gets teared apart in front of his eyes. Even after several info and req was sent to gandhi he was so negligent to solve it. Godse did this because he decided to safe the rest of the women's and children from Pakistan as well as from stupid negligence of Gandhi.
Mr.Arul
Can u Pl list out what are all the benefits e attained from Gandhi. Huge benefits was attained . Yes absolutely true . But not for the nation but for all gandhi surnames. India would have been much more wealthier if ahimsa was not opted and many kids would have got their mom dad sisters and brothers.
First read Gandhi biography. He himself quoted who he is actually. Then you will not come to argue here.